Welcome to Cross County Cardiology

‘I Had Never Felt Worse’: Long Covid Sufferers Are Struggling With Exercise

When Natalie Hollabaugh tested positive for Covid-19 in March 2020, her recovery felt extremely slow. Eighteen months later, she was still suffering from a litany of symptoms, including fatigue, shortness of breath, headaches and joint pain. She saw a cardiologist and a pulmonologist, who both ruled out other health problems, she said. And they advised her to start exercising, suggesting that some of her symptoms may have been a result of being out of shape. So Ms. Hollabaugh dutifully began using an exercise bike, speed walking on a treadmill and walking her dogs several miles a day.

Read More

7 Habits for a Healthy Heart

Worldwide, heart disease and strokes are the leading causes of death. They’re also the leading killers of Americans, accounting for one out of every three deaths in the United States. But there’s good news, too. About 80 percent of all cases of cardiovascular disease are preventable. You can lower your risk markedly by making some changes to your lifestyle including doing some things that are easy, simple and even enjoyable. (Two of our favorites? Drink red wine and get a dog.) Here's what you need to know about heart health, along with some of the best ways to improve and protect yours.

Read More

Exercise and Muscle Function in Symptomatic/Asymptomatic Statin Users

Abstract

Background

The combination of statin therapy and physical activity reduces cardiovascular disease risk in patients with hyperlipidemia more than either treatment alone. However, mitochondrial dysfunction associated with statin treatment could attenuate training adaptations.

Objectives

This study determined whether moderate intensity exercise training improved muscle and exercise performance, muscle mitochondrial function, and fiber capillarization in symptomatic and asymptomatic statin users.

Methods

Symptomatic (n = 16; age 64 ± 4 years) and asymptomatic statin users (n = 16; age 64 ± 4 years) and nonstatin using control subjects (n = 20; age 63 ± 5 years) completed a 12-week endurance and resistance exercise training program. Maximal exercise performance (peak oxygen consumption), muscle performance and muscle symptoms were determined before and after training. Muscle biopsies were collected to assess citrate synthase activity, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production capacity, muscle fiber type distribution, fiber size, and capillarization.

Results

Type I muscle fibers were less prevalent in symptomatic statin users than control subjects at baseline (P = 0.06). Exercise training improved muscle strength (P < 0.001), resistance to fatigue (P = 0.01), and muscle fiber capillarization (P < 0.01), with no differences between groups. Exercise training improved citrate synthase activity in the total group (P < 0.01), with asymptomatic statin users showing less improvement than control subjects (P = 0.02). Peak oxygen consumption, ATP production capacity, fiber size, and muscle symptoms remained unchanged in all groups following training. Quality-of-life scores improved only in symptomatic statin users following exercise training (P < 0.01).

Conclusions

A moderate intensity endurance and resistance exercise training program improves muscle performance, capillarization, and mitochondrial content in both asymptomatic and symptomatic statin users without exacerbating muscle complaints. Exercise training may even increase quality of life in symptomatic statin users. (The Effects of Cholesterol-Lowering Medication on Exercise Performance [STATEX]; NL5972/NTR6346)

Read More

Aortic Valve Replacement vs Conservative Treatment in Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: The AVATAR Trial

We share with you today the AVATAR trial.

Background: Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) represents a class I indication in symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). However, indications for early SAVR in asymptomatic patients with severe AS and normal left ventricular function remain debated.

Methods: The Aortic Valve replAcemenT versus conservative treatment in Asymptomatic seveRe aortic stenosis (AVATAR) trial is an investigator-initiated international prospective randomized controlled trial that evaluated the safety and efficacy of early SAVR in the treatment of asymptomatic patients with severe AS, according to common criteria (valve area ≤1 cm2 with aortic jet velocity >4 m/s or a mean trans-aortic gradient ≥40 mm Hg), and with normal LV function. Negative exercise testing was mandatory for inclusion. The primary hypothesis was that early SAVR would reduce the primary composite endpoint of all-cause death, acute myocardial infarction, stroke or unplanned hospitalization for heart failure, as compared to a conservative strategy according to guidelines. The trial was designed as event-driven to reach a minimum of 35 prespecified events. The study was performed in 9 centers in 7 European countries.

Results: Between June 2015 and September 2020, 157 patients (mean age 67 years, 57 % men) were randomly allocated to early surgery (n=78) or conservative treatment (n=79). Follow-up was completed in May 2021. Overall median follow-up was 32 months: 28 months in the early surgery group and 35 months in the conservative treatment group. There was a total of 39 events, 13 in early surgery and 26 in conservative treatment group. In the early surgery group, 72 patients (92.3 %) underwent SAVR with operative mortality of 1.4 %. In an intention-to-treat analysis, patients randomized to early surgery had a significantly lower incidence of primary composite endpoint than those in the conservative arm (HR 0.46, 95 % CI 0.23-0.90, p=0.02). There was no statistical difference in secondary endpoints, including all-cause mortality, first heart failure hospitalizations, major bleeding or thromboembolic complications, but trends were consistent with the primary outcome.

Conclusions: In asymptomatic patients with severe AS, early surgery reduced a primary composite of all-cause death, acute myocardial infarction, stroke or unplanned hospitalization for heart failure compared with conservative treatment. This randomized trial provides preliminary support for early SAVR once AS becomes severe, regardless of symptoms. 

--

At CCC Mount Sinai, our team of skilled and seasoned cardiac professionals can evaluate, diagnose and recommend treatments as they pertain to this and other heart conditions.  Make an appointment today and know you have the best care. Call 201-499-7361 or go online to learn more.

Original article published 11/13/21 in American Heart Association Journal by authors: Marko Banovic, Svetozar Putnik, Martin Penicka, Gheorghe Doros, Marek A. Deja, Radka Kockova, Martin Kotrc, Sigita Glaveckaite, Hrvoje Gasparovic, Nikola Pavlovic, Lazar Velicki, Stefano Salizzoni, Wojtek Wokakowski, Guy Van Camp, Serge D. Nikolic, Bernard Iung and Jozef Bartunek on behalf of the AVATAR-trial investigators

Read More

Obstructive sleep apnea associated with presence, burden of coronary plaque

A new study highlights an independent association between obstructive sleep apnea and coronary plaque presence and burden, suggesting it may be a risk factor for coronary events.

Read More

Evidence for impaired chronotropic responses to and recovery from 6-minute walk test in women with post-acute COVID-19 syndrome

Abstract

New Findings

  • What is the central question of this study?

    Are chronotropic responses to a 6-minute walk test different in women with post-acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) syndrome compared with control subjects?

  • What is the main finding and its importance?

    Compared with control subjects, the increase in heart rate was attenuated and recovery delayed after a 6-minute walk test in participants after infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Women reporting specific symptoms at time of testing had greater impairments compared with control subjects and SARS-CoV-2 participants not actively experiencing these symptoms. Such alterations have potential to constrain not only exercise tolerance but also participation in free-living physical activity in women during post-acute recovery from COVID-19.

Abstract

The short-term cardiopulmonary manifestations of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are well defined. However, the implications of cardiopulmonary sequelae, persisting beyond acute illness, on physical function are largely unknown. Herein, we characterized heart rate responses to and recovery from a 6-minute walk test (6MWT) in women ∼3 months after mild-to-moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with non-infected control subjects. Forty-five women (n = 29 SARS-CoV-2; n = 16 controls; age = 56 ± 11 years; body mass index = 25.8 ± 6.0 kg/m2) completed pulmonary function testing and a 6MWT. The SARS-CoV-2 participants demonstrated reduced total lung capacity (84 ± 8 vs. 93 ± 13%; P = 0.006), vital capacity (87 ± 10 vs. 93 ± 10%; P = 0.040), functional residual capacity (75 ± 16 vs. 88 ± 16%; P = 0.006) and residual volume (76 ± 18 vs. 93 ± 22%; P = 0.001) compared with control subjects. No between-group differences were observed in 6MWT distance (P = 0.194); however, the increase in heart rate with exertion was attenuated among SARS-CoV-2 participants compared with control subjects (+52 ± 20 vs. +65 ± 18 beats/min; P = 0.029). The decrease in heart rate was also delayed for minutes 1–5 of recovery among SARS-CoV-2 participants (all < 0.05). Women reporting specific symptoms at the time of testing had greater impairments compared with control subjects and SARS-CoV-2 participants not actively experiencing these symptoms. Our findings provide evidence for marked differences in chronotropic responses to and recovery from a 6MWT in women several months after acute SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Read More

How Lifelong Cholesterol Levels Can Harm or Help Your Heart

LDL, or “bad” cholesterol, is a major risk factor for coronary heart disease. Now a new study suggests that, like smoking, it has a cumulative effect over a lifetime: The longer a person has high LDL, the greater their risk of suffering a heart attack or cardiac arrest.

Coronary heart disease, also known as “hardening of the arteries,” is the leading cause of death in the United States. It is caused by a buildup of plaque in the arteries that narrows the vessels and blocks the flow of oxygenated blood to the heart. Often, people have no symptoms and remain unaware they have the disease for years until they develop chest pain or suffer a catastrophic event like a heart attack.

Using data from four large prospective health studies, researchers calculated LDL levels over time in 18,288 people who had multiple LDL tests taken at different ages. They calculated their cumulative exposure to LDL and followed their health for an average of 16 years. The study is in JAMA Cardiology.

The researchers found that the longer a person had high levels of LDL — no matter what their LDL level is in young adulthood or middle age — the greater the risk for coronary heart disease. Compared with those in the lowest quarter for cumulative exposure, those in the highest had a 57 percent increased risk.

They found no increased risk for stroke or heart failure associated with cumulative LDL exposure. The researchers suggest that many factors can contribute to heart failure, and their study had too few cases of stroke to achieve statistical significance.

The study controlled for race and ethnicity, sex, year of birth, body mass index, smoking, high-density lipoprotein (HDL, or “good” cholesterol), blood pressure, Type 2 diabetes and the use of lipid-lowering and blood pressure medicines.

In people under 40, current guidelines recommend treatment with cholesterol-lowering statin drugs only with LDL readings higher than 190, but the researchers found that the increased risk for coronary heart disease may start at a much lower level. (LDL levels below 100 are generally considered normal.)

“Our figures suggest that the risk starts at LDL levels as low as 100,” said the lead author, YiYi Zhang, an assistant professor of medical sciences at Columbia. “That doesn’t necessarily mean that a person under 40 with an LDL of 100 should immediately start treatment. We need more evidence to determine the optimal combination of age and LDL level.”

Dr. Tamara Horwich, a cardiologist and professor of medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, who was not involved in the study, noted that medical guidelines on choosing who needs statin therapy are heavily weighted toward older people, since advancing age is a major risk factor for complications from heart disease.

Still, she said, “From autopsy studies, we have known for some time that atherosclerosis begins to develop in the arteries of young individuals, as early as the teens and 20s. I think this study may entice physicians to move the needle back on the age of starting, or at least thinking about starting, statin therapy.”

Young people have a low short-term risk, Dr. Zhang said, but a high long-term risk. “The main message is to try to maintain low LDL through middle age. That will reduce your heart disease risk.”

--

This study showcases how important it is to get your cholesterol checked, even from a very young age.  We know this to be the case at CCC-Mount Sinai all too well.  Just ask Dr. Rick Pumill to discuss his son Christopher's journey.  He's been prescribing him Statin since age 19 and he still has high LDL, despite regular exercise and a very good diet.  Moreover, Christopher Pumill is a cardiologist too, so he knows all too well about the risks and benefits of a sustaining a good level of LDL. 

We asked Dr. Christopher Pumill to add his perspective to this article:

"In all truthfulness, if you are obese, your cholesterol will change dramatically with diet and weightloss. However, if your cholesterol is elevated at a young age, it is very likely genetic. And therefore modification of diet will have a much smaller impact. For patients who are younger with high cholesterol, we often need medications (as in my case) and consideration of genetic testing and consultation, as it can be hereditary." 

His dad, Dr. Rick Pumill adds:

"I truly believe, having a personal connection with patients improves compliance and I also believe that making them understand that there are times that their abnormal studies are not their fault, makes a difference as well."

At CCC-Mount Sinai, your health and family are important to us.  Call us today at 201-499-7361 or go to our website to schedule an appointment for a cholesterol check on you or your children.  We can evaluate the whole family and help to treat (if necessary).

Authored by Maria Hergueta and published 10/18/21 on the NYtimes.com.

Read More

N.J.’s Top Doctors: Meet the first-rate physicians who lead us to wellness in 2021

Trust. Care. Peace of mind.

The COVID-19 pandemic underscored how dearly we hold those three commodities. And today, as we pull away from the pervasive fear and uncertainty that ruled our lives for more than a year, we still need someone to quell our lingering doubts and help us feel safe.

Doctors are an important piece of our sanity puzzle. Now, as before, we turn to doctors to be a stabilizing force. We look for physicians whose skills and expertise we trust, who make us feel cared for, and who give us peace of mind as they help us on our road to wellness.

But with so many practicing physicians within driving or commuting distance throughout the Garden State, finding the right one can be a daunting task. You need a tool that helps you sort through the options.

For nearly 30 years, Castle Connolly has asked tens of thousands of physicians across the United States to recommend physicians for inclusion on the health care research company’s list of Top Doctors.

For primary care and specialty physicians alike, being recognized as a Top Doctor is the one true mark of excellence in the profession, a sure sign that they are recognized by their peers as among the best in their specialty. And for consumers, the Top Doctor list is a trusted tool for finding a doctor with whom they’ll be in good hands. 

Read More

How One Woman Changed What Doctors Know About Heart Attacks

Katherine Leon was 38 and living in Alexandria, Va., when she gave birth to her second son in 2003. She was discharged from the hospital, but instead of getting better, she recalls, she kept feeling “worse and worse and worse.”

Five weeks after she had her child, Ms. Leon’s husband came back early from work and found her barely able to breathe. “I hate to use the word panic, because so many people say if it’s a woman she is just having a panic attack, but I was terrified,” she said.

Her husband called 911, and she was taken to the emergency room where, after a few tests, the physicians told her there was nothing wrong with her. She went home but continued to have bouts of chest pain and kept laboring to breathe.

Things came to a head several days later, she said, when she developed “that impending doom feeling.” Reluctantly, she called 911 again. Things went differently in the emergency room this time.

“There was a young woman doctor who took care of me,” said Ms. Leon. “Her reaction was totally different. She knew that there was something definitely wrong.”

A few days later, she underwent an explorative cardiac catheterization procedure and received a devastating diagnosis: She had a critical blockage in the main artery supplying her heart. She would need emergency heart bypass surgery.

She remembers thinking at the time: “Are you kidding me? I have two babies and I was going to do the whole mom thing, with playgroups and a jog stroller, and take classes. I may have tried one cigarette in my life. I didn’t have cholesterol issues. I didn’t have blood pressure issues.”

She received what at the time was considered one of the rarest possible diagnoses: spontaneous coronary artery dissection, or SCAD. The condition occurs when one of the arteries supplying the heart with oxygen spontaneously tears open, leading to a heart attack that can sometimes be fatal. It occurs most often in women, and can be exacerbated by pregnancy.

But at the time, few doctors knew that SCAD even existed, or knew much about it. “You are never going to meet anyone else who has this,” Ms. Leon remembers one doctor telling her. Another told her, “You need to move on and enjoy your children.”

Her doctors also told her that the only thing she could do to avoid SCAD in the future was to never get pregnant again. But seeking to learn more about the disease that had almost taken her life, she went online and started to find other women with similar symptoms around the world.

In 2009, Ms. Leon went to the WomenHeart Science and Leadership Symposium at the Mayo Clinic, where she met Dr. Sharonne N. Hayes, a professor of cardiovascular medicine at Mayo. At that time, the largest study on SCAD included 43 patients. “I walked up to Dr. Hayes and told her we had 70 people, and we wanted research,” Ms. Leon recalled. “She was like, ‘Wow.’”

“Everything I learned about SCAD in my medical training was wrong,” Dr. Hayes said.

By 2010, with the help of Dr. Hayes, and subsequently SCAD Research Inc., an organization founded by Bob Alico, who lost his wife to SCAD, Dr. Hayes devised an innovative way to do research, using online networks of far-flung patients and analyzing genetic and clinical data. “We never imagined there would be 1,000 female patients in our virtual registry,” Dr. Hayes said.

That fortuitous meeting between Ms. Leon and Dr. Hayes has helped transform SCAD from being an unknown, unrecognized condition to something all physicians are taught about during medical school and in later training. SCAD is now recognized as the most common cause of heart attacks in women under 40.

Why did it take so long for physicians and researchers to recognize SCAD? The most important reason might have been that the condition predominantly affects women. “We listen less well to women,” said Dr. Hayes. “We are much more likely to associate their symptoms with psychological causes.” A heart attack is more likely to be fatal in a young woman than a young man, perhaps because women’s cardiac symptoms are more often misattributed to anxiety or depression than men’s.

The bias that many women feel they face in the clinic or the emergency room has led some, like Ms. Leon, to take action and advocate for themselves and others. “People are activated by injustice, by unanswered questions,” said Dr. Hayes

She offers this advice: “Don’t walk out of a doctor’s office without answers. Find a doctor who is committed to listening to you and does not think they know everything about anything.”

The story of SCAD underscores how much we doctors still don’t understand, including about heart disease in women. Too often those in the medical profession downplay women’s complaints, telling them nothing is wrong. Women are often expected to take care of others but too often neglect themselves. Indeed, women take much longer to seek medical care for a heart attack than men. As we embrace new technologies to peer ever deeper inside the human body to find answers, perhaps the better route might be simply to attend to the patient in front of us. Often what we need to do is listen.

At Cross County Cardiology - Mount Sinai, we are leading experts in cardiovascular care, with the best resources to help you or someone you love with your heart health.  So if you think you maybe suffering from SCAD, please give us a call at 201-499-7361.  Timing is so key!

Original article published on nytimes.com on Feb 1, 2019 by Haider Warraich, M.D.

Read More

Can a Low-Carb Diet Help Cardiovascular Disease?

Going on a low-carb diet has long been a popular weight loss strategy. But some doctors and nutrition experts have advised against doing so over fears that it could increase the risk of heart disease, since such diets typically involve eating lots of saturated fats, the kind found in red meat and butter.

But a new study, one of the largest and most rigorous trials of the subject to date, suggests that eating a diet low in carbohydrates and higher in fats may be beneficial for your cardiovascular health if you are overweight.

The new study, which was published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, found that overweight and obese people who increased their fat intake and lowered the amount of refined carbohydrates in their diet — while still eating fiber-rich foods like fresh fruits, vegetables, nuts, beans and lentils — had greater improvements in their cardiovascular disease risk factors than those who followed a similar diet that was lower in fat and higher in carbs. Even people who replaced “healthy” whole grain carbs like brown rice and whole wheat bread with foods higher in fat showed striking improvements in a variety of metabolic disease risk factors.

The study suggests that eating fewer processed carbs while eating more fat can be good for your heart health, said Dr. Dariush Mozaffarian, a cardiologist and dean of the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University, who was not involved with the research. “I think this is an important study,” he said. “Most Americans still believe that low-fat foods are healthier for them, and this trial shows that at least for these outcomes, the high-fat, low-carb group did better.”

Read More
Sign up to join the conversation.

Recent Posts